 |
||||||||
|
11/15/2005 07:35:00 PM | Justin Which is it, Samuel Alito? (link) The latest indication that abortion will play a major role in the confirmation hearings comes from a 1985 document written by Judge Alito.So apparently in '85, Judge Alito, personally believed the US constitution didn't support abortion. But now, Judge Alito is trying disown those views: "[He said to me] I am now a judge, you know, I have been on the circuit court for 15 years and it is very different. I am not an advocate. I do not give heed to my personal views," she said."The interesting thing about his defense is that it does not even suggest he might support abortion rights: OK Alito, so you don't "give heed to [your] person views". But in '85 you said it was your personal view that "the constitution" does not support the right to an abortion. So conservatives trying to shoe Alito onto the Supreme court can't fairly claim that by strictly interpreting the constitution, Alito will be able to rule on abortion issues impartially. Maybe if he'd said "it's my personal view that abortion is wrong", conservatives might have had a case, but if the guy comes into the judgeship with the pre-established opinion of what the constitution says on this issue, I don't see how he could possibly be an impartial arbiter on the issue. If it were a jury trial, and a jurer had expressed a pre-established opinion of this sort, they'd never be allowed to be a juror. I'm not sure whether the same standard offically applies here, but it seems like it should, especially on such a contentious issue as abortion. Also, Alito's supporters can't claim as they did for Roberts that Alito was "doing his job" by expessing anti-abortion opinions, because in this case, a) Alito had not received the job yet b) Alito explicitly says this is his personal view, which is different from simply justifying a view. It sounds to me like Alito is trying to suggest the possibility he may have been lying back then just to get a job: Not the most persuasive or respectable case. The sad part is, liberals might have been better off passing the less experience Harriet Miers, rather than the more experienced Alito, who clearly holds such views. perma link |
| 0 comments
0 Comments: |
Dartmouth The Free Press Alums for Social Change The Green Magazine The Dartmouth Dartmouth Observer Dartmouth Review Dartlog Inner Office The Little Green Blog Welton Chang's Blog Vox in Sox MN Publius (Matthew Martin) Netblitz Dartmouth Official News Other Blogs Ampersand Atrios Arts & Letters Altercation Body and Soul Blog For America Brad DeLong Brad Plumer CalPundit Campus Nonsense Clarksphere Crooked Timber Cursor Daily Kos Dean Nation Dan Drezner The Front Line Instapundit Interesting Times Is That Legal? Talking Points Memo Lady-Likely Lawrence Lessig Lean Left Left2Right Legal Theory Matthew Yglesias Ms. Musings MWO Nathan Newman New Republic's &c. Not Geniuses Ornicus Oxblog Pandagon Political State Report Political Theory Daily Review Queer Day Roger Ailes SCOTUS blog Talk Left TAPPED Tacitus This Modern World Tough Democrat Untelevised Volokh Conspiracy Washington Note X. & Overboard Magazines, Newspapers and Journals Boston Globe Ideas Boston Review Chronicle of Higher Education Common Dreams Dissent In These Times Mother Jones New York Review of Books New York Times Salon Slate The American Prospect The Nation The New Republic The Progressive Tikkun Tom Paine Village Voice Washington Monthly Capitol Hill Media ABC's The Note American Journalism Review Columbia Journalism Review CQ Daily Howler Donkey Rising The Hill Medianews National Journal NJ Hotline NJ Wake-up call NJ Early Bird NJ Weekly Political Wire Roll Call Spinsanity Search Search the DFP  |
|||||||
The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.