1/02/2004 05:19:00 PM | Timothy Compare Dean and Clark on religion Amy Sullivan, a divinity student at Princieton, firmly believes Democrats need to understand religion to appeal to American voters. Check out this article in the Washington Monthly and her blog, political aims. She says: This is a 48-48 country. The crucial votes needed to knock a candidate over the 50 percent line will come from swing voters -- and whether you like it or not, many of them are socially conservative and don't respond well to aggressive secularism. I will shout this from the rooftops if necessary: YOU DON'T NEED TO PANDER TO THEM. But don't, don't thumb your noses at them. There's no need. Really. Unless you are secretly looking forward to another four years of W.She has some criticisms of Dean's clumsiness as well. Here is the Boston Globe reporting again on Dean and religion: "Let's get into a little religion here," Dean said at a morning meeting with voters in response to a question about his beliefs. "Don't you think Jerry Falwell reminds you a lot more of the Pharisees than he does of the teachings of Jesus? And don't you think this campaign ought to be about evicting the money changers from the temple?"...Compare this with TNR's Michelle Cottle's obvervations of Clark: That said, the meatier segments of Clark's "True Grits" kickoff speech weren't half bad. Instead of babbling about the joys of NASCAR, Clark waded in to talk about core Southern values like patriotism, family, and faith--areas where Democrats absolutely cannot cede the field to W. The general was particularly clever when tackling the God question, noting that faith isn't just about where or to whom you pray, "but the values your faith teaches you. Charity, integrity, kindness. Growing up in Arkansas, we always knew a few people who could preach a revival, but who didn't live it. And now we've got one in the White House. George W. Bush talks a lot about his faith, but he hasn't exactly backed up his words with deeds. In fact, the only charity he's given is to big business and the very rich." Clark then enumerated a few of the ways in which W.'s uncharitable policies have undercut American families. perma link |
| 0 comments
0 Comments: |
Dartmouth The Free Press Alums for Social Change The Green Magazine The Dartmouth Dartmouth Observer Dartmouth Review Dartlog Inner Office The Little Green Blog Welton Chang's Blog Vox in Sox MN Publius (Matthew Martin) Netblitz Dartmouth Official News Other Blogs Ampersand Atrios Arts & Letters Altercation Body and Soul Blog For America Brad DeLong Brad Plumer CalPundit Campus Nonsense Clarksphere Crooked Timber Cursor Daily Kos Dean Nation Dan Drezner The Front Line Instapundit Interesting Times Is That Legal? Talking Points Memo Lady-Likely Lawrence Lessig Lean Left Left2Right Legal Theory Matthew Yglesias Ms. Musings MWO Nathan Newman New Republic's &c. Not Geniuses Ornicus Oxblog Pandagon Political State Report Political Theory Daily Review Queer Day Roger Ailes SCOTUS blog Talk Left TAPPED Tacitus This Modern World Tough Democrat Untelevised Volokh Conspiracy Washington Note X. & Overboard Magazines, Newspapers and Journals Boston Globe Ideas Boston Review Chronicle of Higher Education Common Dreams Dissent In These Times Mother Jones New York Review of Books New York Times Salon Slate The American Prospect The Nation The New Republic The Progressive Tikkun Tom Paine Village Voice Washington Monthly Capitol Hill Media ABC's The Note American Journalism Review Columbia Journalism Review CQ Daily Howler Donkey Rising The Hill Medianews National Journal NJ Hotline NJ Wake-up call NJ Early Bird NJ Weekly Political Wire Roll Call Spinsanity Search Search the DFP |