11/15/2003 10:57:00 PM | Brad Plumer And the winner: Blanco. Too early to write off the South just yet. perma link |
| 0 comments
11/15/2003 03:07:00 PM | Brad Plumer More important news: Well, day old news, I guess, but Gary Kasparov is losing to yet another computer chess program in a four-game match. Kasparov has a loss and a draw, while the virtual reality program "X3D Fritz" has a win and a draw. Fritz had previously trounced Big Blue, the computer who handed grandmaster Kasparov his only professional defeat back in 1997. Charles Krauthammer wrote an incisive analysis of the event for the Weekly Standard back then, which is still worth reading. All this brings to mind the epic Karpov-Kasparov matches in the 1980s. In 1987, when Kasparov proved himself the greatest player in the world, Economist had this to say about the politics of the match: This being chess, politics have played almost as big a part in the contest as the two Soviet grandmasters. The 24-year-old Mr Kasparov projects openness and even rebelliousness against authority. His supporters in the West say he is more in tune with Mr Gorbachev's new Russia than his brilliant but dour 36-year-old rival. At the end of the match, Mr Kasparov spoke to journalists about glasnost, perestroika and shaking up chess's ruling international body, FIDE; Mr Karpov did not give a press conference at all.If you can find it, Martin Amis wrote a brilliant little essay a while back about the specter of communism hanging over those matches. Kasparov was more than up to the challenge. Alas, as Pejman Yousefzadeh notes, it's possible that Kasparov is no longer the right man to defend the honor of mankind. perma link |
| 0 comments
11/14/2003 08:32:00 PM | Timothy The Note on Dean and the Confederate Flag: Dean was asked about the flag issue at a town hall meeting in Hampton, New Hampshire. Dean acknowledged that it was a mistake to use that particular phrasing. perma link |
| 0 comments
11/14/2003 08:29:00 PM | Timothy From The Note on Kerry: The questioner referenced Kerry's Wednesday appearance on Manchester's WGIR, but Kerry insisted he had not said those words: perma link |
| 0 comments
11/14/2003 06:37:00 PM | Timothy The Other Flag Issue That's why it's so disappointing that Clark told a group of veterans yesterday that he supports a constitutional amendment to ban burning of the American flag. You could see President Bush trying to make this an issue in the campaign. (His father used it to impugn Michael Dukaksis's patriotism in 1988.) But Clark, of all the candidates, is perfectly insulated against attacks on his patriotism. Which means his support for the amendment must be genuine, not merely tactical. And that is genuinely scary. (TNR)And I was liking Clark's talk of a new American patriotism. But if this is what it means, forget it. perma link |
| 0 comments
11/14/2003 10:17:00 AM | Anonymous Big Brother strikes again! From today's NYT. Sure wouldn't want the truth getting out there. No, no, can't have that. perma link |
| 0 comments
11/13/2003 10:19:00 PM | Timothy Can't Reviewers take a joke? From The New York Times, May 13, 1992: Late last month, six staff members of The Harvard Lampoon humor magazine loaded 2,000 copies of their latest spoof into a Range Rover and drove two hours north to Hanover, N.H.Oh come on, no reasonable person could possibly think the Review would put Hitler in preppy garb. perma link |
| 0 comments
11/13/2003 08:05:00 PM | Timothy It Depends on what the meaning of "State of Affairs" and "Unprecedented" is... Andrew Grossman, former editor of the Dartmouth Review, says this about Democratic filibustering of judicial nominees: Democrat senators’ holds and promised filibusters block another dozen or so nominees. This state of affairs is unprecedented: never before has the Senate denied a judicial nominee a simple up-or-down vote with a filibuster. (No, Abe Fortas’s 1968 nomination to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court doesn’t count; President Johnson, sensing that Fortas would lose an eventual vote to bipartisan opposition, withdrew Fortas’s nomination after four months and one lost cloture vote.)Well, I guess the Democrats will have to stop filibustering, and go with precedent: just continue voting against cloture! (I'm waiting for someone to defend the absurd argument a first vote against cloture is consitutional but by some legal and metaphysical magic each additional vote against cloture is unconstitutional. Bonus Points: Defend that position using Bush's favored judicial philosophy of strict constructionalism) A Filibuster Framed for Fox Hah! How pathetic are the Republicans? Here's from a GOP memo read by a Democratic Senator on the floor of the house: It is important to double your efforts to get your boss to S-230 on time. Fox News channel is really excited about the marathon. Britt [sic] Hume at 6 would love to open the door to all our 51 Senators walking on to the floor. The producer wants to know, will we walk in exactly at 6:02 when the show starts so we can get it live to open Britt Hume's show? Or, if not, can we give them an exact time for the walk-in start? perma link |
| 0 comments
11/13/2003 12:33:00 AM | Brad Plumer Poor form: Graham Roth obviously has a history of sending thoughtless blitzes, but this blitz, posted by Emmett, really takes the cake: --- Forwarded message from Graham Roth ---Edit: Commenters have pointed out that the posters explicitly claimed to be sponsored by the Young Dems. I didn't notice that at all when I saw the posters (it's in tiny print at the bottom), and that, to me, changes everything. The blitz, of course, made it seem like they were taken down for being immature, and maybe that was the primary reason (which is deplorable), but ultimately it was justified. So Graham, I apologize for the attack. It was overhasty and I should have asked you about it first. That said, if the poster had only sported the "Generation Dean" logo on top, the tear-downs would have been unwarranted. Yes, it's a bit misleading, but so what? How do you feel about posters that attack or parody McDonald's using their logo (like this one?). What if someone put up a parody poster attacking Bush using the "official" Bush-Cheney 2004 logo? What about this website? Should we burn t-shirts that parody the college social norms campaign ("the average student drinks 10-11-12 drinks" etc.)? After all, someone might mistakenly think that the college is sponsoring these ads, huh? perma link |
| 0 comments
11/09/2003 06:37:00 PM | Brad Plumer More ninnies: Last week Republicans unearthed a memo written by Democrats in the Senate Select Committee that revealed shocking aims: to push for an investigation into administration wrongdoing. Sean Hannity called it "politicized" intelligence. Rick Santorum threatened to shove all those damn Democrats off the committee. Bill Frist decided to freeze further investigation of prewar intelligence in Iraq, at least until the Democrats said they were sorry. Apparently none of them bothered to do what Kevin Drum did and actually read the memo. And it turns out, the memo's harmless. Entirely harmless. Basically it comes down to two facts: the Republicans are trying to shift the focus of the investigation away from the administration, and the Democrats want a wider, more persistent inquiry to figure out why intelligence was wrong. Um, pardon, but isn't that exactly why we have a Senate Intelligence Committee? To, uh, investigate? Why are Republicans fuming and carping so much? Jay Nordlinger should issue a retraction for this old OpinionJournal piece. Would "real men" ever moan and whine like this? Hm? perma link |
| 0 comments
11/09/2003 06:03:00 PM | Brad Plumer Whiners and their whining whines... Bill O'Reilly's new beef: writers and publishers. Apparently, Terry McAuliffe and the DNC are peddling their... their... b-b-books (!) on members and contributors, and perhaps even paying people to write liberal books. O'Reilly aghast: Now the danger is that DNC Chief Terry McAuliffe is using and paying professional hit men to demean and denigrate political opponents. That's exactly what President Nixon did when he used the plumber's union to harass his opponents.Books are intimidating like plumber's unions are intimidating? Wah--? It's time to ask: when did conservatives become such ninnies? O'Reilly is fine with Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter, but when liberals start striking back he squeals out "smear book!," "smear book!" Reminds me of all that "poor Rush Limbaugh" talk. Incidentally, O'Reilly won't name a single liberal book he has a problem with. Then again, that might require him to back up his attacks. Ooh, for more sob stories, read this piece where O'Reilly complains that he's misunderstood. The poor guy can't understand why everyone calls him an ideologue. Quick hint: when you start sniveling on and on about "hurtful" liberal books-- heck, when you try to suppress "hurtful" books with frivolous law suits-- you get branded an ideologue real quick. Now stop crying. perma link |
| 0 comments
|
Dartmouth The Free Press Alums for Social Change The Green Magazine The Dartmouth Dartmouth Observer Dartmouth Review Dartlog Inner Office The Little Green Blog Welton Chang's Blog Vox in Sox MN Publius (Matthew Martin) Netblitz Dartmouth Official News Other Blogs Ampersand Atrios Arts & Letters Altercation Body and Soul Blog For America Brad DeLong Brad Plumer CalPundit Campus Nonsense Clarksphere Crooked Timber Cursor Daily Kos Dean Nation Dan Drezner The Front Line Instapundit Interesting Times Is That Legal? Talking Points Memo Lady-Likely Lawrence Lessig Lean Left Left2Right Legal Theory Matthew Yglesias Ms. Musings MWO Nathan Newman New Republic's &c. Not Geniuses Ornicus Oxblog Pandagon Political State Report Political Theory Daily Review Queer Day Roger Ailes SCOTUS blog Talk Left TAPPED Tacitus This Modern World Tough Democrat Untelevised Volokh Conspiracy Washington Note X. & Overboard Magazines, Newspapers and Journals Boston Globe Ideas Boston Review Chronicle of Higher Education Common Dreams Dissent In These Times Mother Jones New York Review of Books New York Times Salon Slate The American Prospect The Nation The New Republic The Progressive Tikkun Tom Paine Village Voice Washington Monthly Capitol Hill Media ABC's The Note American Journalism Review Columbia Journalism Review CQ Daily Howler Donkey Rising The Hill Medianews National Journal NJ Hotline NJ Wake-up call NJ Early Bird NJ Weekly Political Wire Roll Call Spinsanity Search Search the DFP |