11/03/2003 12:26:00 PM | Brad Plumer That darn quagmire... Two words for Wesley Clark's interview with NewsHour: not impressed. Here's Clark's proposal for dealing with the Iraq occupation: I put the international authority in. I reduce the influence of the U.S. occupying authority. I put the Iraqi governing council more in charge. I work for the constitution of the Iraqis in the long term. I keep the U.S. in charge of the security situation. I build up the Iraqi security forces. And I would... I do it all the same way we did it, let's say, in the Balkans. We put out a matrix. You said here's your political. Here's your economic. Here's your military. Here's what you're going to do this month, that month, so forth. Here's where you want to be. Here's your objectives. Here's how much it's going to cost. Show it to the American people.Okay, so I'd be inclined to believe that Clark could probably oversee the operation more competently than Bush. But his "solution" doesn't really solve anything. There's no assurance that turning over the occupation to the UN would encourage foreign countries to pony up more aid and soldiers. Heck, there's no assurance that we even could turn authority over to the UN. Moreover, we've seen nothing to indicate that the Iraqi governing council is ready to take over. If anything, we'd be gearing up for Hamid Karzai part two. And the violence isn't going to end so long as foreign soldiers are in Iraq-- does Clark really think that adding a few German/French troops here and there will stop the terrorist attacks? What is the reasoning behind that? The ugly part is that Clark and Bush are probably the only two presidential candidates who can seriously and credibly handle this situation... and neither of them have a half-decent strategy. It's time to realize that no one knows how to handle this situation. The Dem candidates continue to delude themselves into thinking that their UN trump card will magically fix everything. Only Donald Rumsfeld seems to have any appreciation for the real difficulties inherent in the occupation, and as Kevin Drum points out, the Pentagon may very well be working on a "Cut and Run" style strategy at this point. Which is just as foolish as anything Dennis Kucinich has proposed. perma link |
| 0 comments
0 Comments: |
Dartmouth The Free Press Alums for Social Change The Green Magazine The Dartmouth Dartmouth Observer Dartmouth Review Dartlog Inner Office The Little Green Blog Welton Chang's Blog Vox in Sox MN Publius (Matthew Martin) Netblitz Dartmouth Official News Other Blogs Ampersand Atrios Arts & Letters Altercation Body and Soul Blog For America Brad DeLong Brad Plumer CalPundit Campus Nonsense Clarksphere Crooked Timber Cursor Daily Kos Dean Nation Dan Drezner The Front Line Instapundit Interesting Times Is That Legal? Talking Points Memo Lady-Likely Lawrence Lessig Lean Left Left2Right Legal Theory Matthew Yglesias Ms. Musings MWO Nathan Newman New Republic's &c. Not Geniuses Ornicus Oxblog Pandagon Political State Report Political Theory Daily Review Queer Day Roger Ailes SCOTUS blog Talk Left TAPPED Tacitus This Modern World Tough Democrat Untelevised Volokh Conspiracy Washington Note X. & Overboard Magazines, Newspapers and Journals Boston Globe Ideas Boston Review Chronicle of Higher Education Common Dreams Dissent In These Times Mother Jones New York Review of Books New York Times Salon Slate The American Prospect The Nation The New Republic The Progressive Tikkun Tom Paine Village Voice Washington Monthly Capitol Hill Media ABC's The Note American Journalism Review Columbia Journalism Review CQ Daily Howler Donkey Rising The Hill Medianews National Journal NJ Hotline NJ Wake-up call NJ Early Bird NJ Weekly Political Wire Roll Call Spinsanity Search Search the DFP |