Free Dartmouth
 
  home  
  join
9/01/2003 05:30:00 PM | Timothy

On "Por La Raza todo. Fuera de la Raza Nada"
Kausfiles runs a correction on something he said about MEChA:
What's the translation of "Por La Raza todo. Fuera de la Raza Nada"? Alert reader W.M. suggests that kf (and the LAT, and Michelle Malkin) have been mistranslating this MEChA slogan, and I think he has a point. Instead of "For the Race, everything. For those outside the Race nothing," (Translation #1) the phrase may mean either

"By means of the Race, everything. Outside the Race, nothing." (Translation #2)

or

"On behalf of the Race, everything. Outside the Race, nothing." (Translation #3)

Either of those translations would be considerably more benign than the wildly offensive one that's been given. They would be more typical and precise expressions of a virulent and misguided identity politics--e.g. that the ethnic background of Chicanos is the most important thing about them, and that the only route to political and personal advancement is through ethnic solidarity as Chicanos (as opposed to, say, as Americans or as individuals). ... The context is ambiguous, however. It's a pretty strident passage, with distinctly unfriendly references to the "foreign Europeans" and the "foreigner 'gabacho' who exploits our riches and destroys our culture." Maybe the slogan is ambiguous too. ... Reader feedback requested: Further consultation with better Spanish speakers more familiar with 1960's Chicano radicalism is required--if that means any of you, please fill me in. ... But it seems very possible at least that the importation of the nasty reference to "those outside the race"--e.g., non-Chicanos--was unwarranted. I've corrected the text and appended updates below. ... Still ... : Either way, the LAT was still wrong in suggesting that the slogan wasn't part of the MEChA philosophy, and it's still true that an Anglo group with an equivalent slogan would be pilloried (by the Times and others). I still want ex-Mechista Cruz Bustamante to say whether or not he agrees with it, and if he says he agrees, or if--as I suspect--he disagrees and doesn't have the minimal courage to say he disagrees, I don't think I want him to be governor. ...
What's the difference between #1 and #3? The difference between saying, "Those outside the Race should wind up with nothing" (#1) and, "We'll do nothing outside of what we do to help the Race--i.e., we won't work to benefit outsiders or ourselves as individuals" (#3).
One of the commenters on Roger Ailes had this to say:
The phrase is: "Por la raza todos. Fuera de la raza nada."
"Por" in this context means "by", as in "done by" or "with the help of".
One of Mickey's alternative translations is to this effect. Yet he reads the most malevolent sense into it. To me, someone who actually KNOWS Spanish-speaking people (and is married to one), it most logically means, "Anything we can do will have to be through ourselves. We can't expect any help from whites." Which would in fact validate Mickey's pet theory of self-reliance -- though he can't see it, being too bigoted, too insulated in his world of right-wing ideology and the very lucrative, whites-only life that it brings him.
I should emphasize that I personally do not know a wit of Spanish. Again, this type of thing (as well as tests and conference going) is why I had been somewhat hesitant in making an immediate global pronouncement on Bustamante's MEChA connections (particularly when it is said MEChA is like the KKK). Again, I personally have issues with communitarian sentiments, but that doesn't mean they are necessarily racist. I've also noticed on nexis an uptick of California papers mentioning Bustamante's MEChA membership. Politically speaking, California Republicans would be in a much better position to make an appeal to the electorate if they had never had a nasty campaign for Proposition 187.
ALSO: Be sure to read Tacitus.



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Dartmouth
The Free Press

Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs
Ampersand

Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals
Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media
ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search
Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.