Free Dartmouth
 
  home  
  join
8/19/2003 05:50:00 PM | Timothy

Bush Lies
Or, rather, look at his mendacity on display here:
In an interview with the Armed Forces Radio and Television Service given on Thursday and released by the White House yesterday, Bush interrupted the questioner when asked about his announcement on May 1 of, as the journalist put it, "the end of combat operations."
"Actually, major military operations," Bush replied. "Because we still have combat operations going on." Bush added: "It's a different kind of combat mission, but, nevertheless, it's combat, just ask the kids that are over there killing and being shot at."
In his May 1 speech on the USS Abraham Lincoln, Bush declared: "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country." The headline on the White House site above Bush's May 1 speech is "President Bush Announces Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended."
Ok, Bush corrects a questioner by saying something isn't true, but that thing turns out to be what Bush had said. Tell that to troops, indeed. Read the whole thing. Another confirmation that the Bushies are fundamentally dishonest.

Update: In seeming Orwellian fashion, the White House has even changed its website after the Post story. The headline of the carrier speech was originally listed as 'President Bush Announces Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended'. Actually, as I'm writing this, I have to say I would say it would be really Orwellian if they had changed the text of the speech, or the headline, to major 'Military Operations' in line with President Bush's revisionism noted in the Post article. Instead they just added a 'major' before 'combat'. In this case, this change doesn't particularly matter, as it does match what the president said then. Even if it does support the general tendency of the White House to be revisionist, it's hard for me to get all that exercized about these specifics. That's not true of what the President said above, which showed real mendacity. A blogger notes:
"I don't know why the WH is so concerned over the word 'major' as it is absolutely evident that both 'major combat operations' and 'combat operations' have not ended. Bush loses either way.
It depends on what the meaning of 'major' is? Actually, this is more tractable in other ways and it is less worthwhile to simply see it as 'Clintonian', because it is touches on a political issue: if the meaning of 'major' is up for dispute, it could be up for the voters to decide, in the sense that it corresponds to how they feel about the continuing number of deaths after the aircraft carrier speech. That number, I believe, is now approaching the number of troops who have died while 'major combat operations' were going on.
Another Update: Hmmm... The web-updating of the white house site seems more extensive (and clumsy) than I thought it was. I might have spoke to soon, and it could have relevence after all. Judge for yourself. The State Dept. still has President Bush Announces Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended as the title for the text of the Lincoln speech, where the white house people seem to be changing multiple references to "Combat Operations" to "Major Combat Operations." (and having a date stamp on the webpage of August 18 for a May speech) Basically, the only relevence I see is that if the President wants to explain his revisionism above through clever parsing. (ie. 'Major Combat Operations' = 'Military Operations' while simply 'Combat Operations' = what is going on today). That doesn't fly because their official website have said 'Combat Operations' are over. Eh. Whatever. Not too excited anymore. I need to study!!!



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Dartmouth
The Free Press

Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs
Ampersand

Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals
Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media
ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search
Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.