Free Dartmouth
 
  home  
  join
7/31/2003 03:41:00 PM | Brad Plumer

Sex and consent in the Midwest: Illinois has passed a new law stating that people can change their minds during sex and withdraw consent at any time:

(c) A person who initially consents to sexual penetration or sexual conduct is not deemed to have consented to any sexual penetration or sexual conduct that occurs after he or she withdraws consent during the course of that sexual penetration or sexual conduct.
My first reaction was that this is no big deal. If a woman changes her mind during intercourse and clearly states that she wants to stop, she should be able to stop. I'm guessing that this situation wouldn't occur very often. I would hope that most men could deal with the ensuing disappointment (and slight discomfort), and simply call the whole thing off.

But naturally, questions and doubts are bound to come up. As Dahlia Lithwick points out in this must-read Slate article, modern sexual assault laws are now stacked against men, after a long legal evolution. Whether this is justified or not-- and I think it is-- is a debate in itself. The issue here is that the Illinois laws make the male position even more precarious. Consensual intercourse is no longer safe; a man must now have unmitigated consent from the very first sultry glance to the final orgasm. And as the initial consents pile up, it becomes more and more difficult for any later refusal to seem at all meaningful. If a man has received consent right up until midway through intercourse, how seriously can he be expected to take a sudden display of hesitancy? I can't imagine very many people can just "turn off" during sex, especially if they're receiving vague signs of doubt. So does this make it that much easier for women to accuse men of rape, even when the man might have reasonably thought that he did absolutely nothing wrong? I can imagine scenarios where this law becomes abused: Woman consents to sex with Man, Woman thinks otherwise halfway through, confused Man doesn't stop right away, Man finally gets the hint and stops after 2 minutes, Man gets charged with rape. I don't know if this scenario is common or not, but it's within the realm of possibility, no?

Well, that's that. Ampersand has a longer post defending the law, and one with which I probably agree in the end. Even so, between this and the Kobe Bryant case, I think we very well might start seeing more discussions about protecting men from sexual assault charges.



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Dartmouth
The Free Press

Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs
Ampersand

Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals
Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media
ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search
Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.