6/21/2003 04:39:00 PM | Brad Plumer Lackluster charter schools The Washington Post has an interesting two-part article (one and two) about DC charter schools. These schools run themselves according to independent charters written by parents, community groups, educators, etc. On the whole, according to analysts, the schools do no better than the rest of the public school system. Reading the article, it's not hard to figure out why: Many of the charter schools fill narrow educational niches. Marriott Hospitality, for example, is a high school providing training for the hotel and restaurant industry. The Elsie Whitlow Stokes elementary school has immersion programs in French and Spanish. And the Integrated Design & Electronics Academy gives teenagers a mix of vocational, military and college prep classes.Blah blah my son's special and creative blah blah. Can anyone name any school that runs its classes like military drill sessions, as Ms. Doar claims? This is a bullshit excuse used to shield children from any amount of stress. Yet researchers have proven again and again that the only way to turn out intelligent kids is to force them to do hard work. And yes, that might mean your little genius has to stoop to memorizing multiplication tables. But he will assuredly be much better off learning long division than this hippie nonsense: On a typical morning at Children's Studio this spring, a painter and a choreographer were guiding a dozen students in a sun-drenchedclassroom through lessons in geometry, dance and 17th-century architecture. One group of youngsters was weaving a loose lattice of string. Another was measuring floor tile. At each stage, the two teachers were making connections between mathematical symmetry, the Palace of Versailles and the invention of ballet. Outside the classroom, the hallways were crammed with mobiles, paintings, sculptures and chimes.I will wager the farm that this classroom turns out idiots and dullards who are no more creative than your average public school student. Unfortunately, while the Post notes that charter kids are not doing any better on standardized tests, they fail to single out which schools are the worst offenders. They fail to make any connection between string-weaving and low test scores. Instead, they cite the usual sniveling excuse that: There are no charters in the most affluent neighborhoods of the city, where most of the top-scoring traditional schools are located. Parents in those neighborhoods are likely to send their children to private school or to raise money to pay for additional teachers and programs at their neighborhood public school.Utter crap. Money and social inequities are a factor, yes, but that doesn't have to stop schools from doing well. Look at Barclay Elementary School in Baltimore. A poor, black school shot to top levels in educational achievement after principal Gertrude Williams installed a rigorous curriculum and brought a stern sense of order and discipline to the classrooms, hallways and adminstrative offices. These things work, and they work far better than flowery dance lessons and hazy "whole language" approaches to reading and math (which have proved to be a colossal failure). Although I agree in theory with school choice, I'm reconsidering after this article. Charter schools give ignorant parents and educators too much freedom in determining the shape of a school. Too many parents and educators think that "creative", naturalistic approaches to education are best for their kids. Too many parents and educators think they can happily blame social inequality when kids at these schools don't do well on standardized tests (which are neither racist nor biased nor a poor indicator of achievement). But they don't know what's best for kids, and if they really need proof, they can ask Japan, Taiwan, France, England, Germany, etc. etc. Until parents and educators realize this, they'll continue to create lackluster charter schools. Media outfits like the Post need to do a better job of asking why these schools aren't working, and what can be done to improve them. perma link |
| 0 comments
0 Comments: |
Dartmouth The Free Press Alums for Social Change The Green Magazine The Dartmouth Dartmouth Observer Dartmouth Review Dartlog Inner Office The Little Green Blog Welton Chang's Blog Vox in Sox MN Publius (Matthew Martin) Netblitz Dartmouth Official News Other Blogs Ampersand Atrios Arts & Letters Altercation Body and Soul Blog For America Brad DeLong Brad Plumer CalPundit Campus Nonsense Clarksphere Crooked Timber Cursor Daily Kos Dean Nation Dan Drezner The Front Line Instapundit Interesting Times Is That Legal? Talking Points Memo Lady-Likely Lawrence Lessig Lean Left Left2Right Legal Theory Matthew Yglesias Ms. Musings MWO Nathan Newman New Republic's &c. Not Geniuses Ornicus Oxblog Pandagon Political State Report Political Theory Daily Review Queer Day Roger Ailes SCOTUS blog Talk Left TAPPED Tacitus This Modern World Tough Democrat Untelevised Volokh Conspiracy Washington Note X. & Overboard Magazines, Newspapers and Journals Boston Globe Ideas Boston Review Chronicle of Higher Education Common Dreams Dissent In These Times Mother Jones New York Review of Books New York Times Salon Slate The American Prospect The Nation The New Republic The Progressive Tikkun Tom Paine Village Voice Washington Monthly Capitol Hill Media ABC's The Note American Journalism Review Columbia Journalism Review CQ Daily Howler Donkey Rising The Hill Medianews National Journal NJ Hotline NJ Wake-up call NJ Early Bird NJ Weekly Political Wire Roll Call Spinsanity Search Search the DFP |