Free Dartmouth
 
  home  
  join
4/09/2003 08:28:00 PM | Timothy

Straight unstraight strait talk
I'm not sure WHAT to call Kerry's call that all judges uphold Roe v. Wade. From NJ's Hotline:
Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) said "as president he would only appoint judges" to SCOTUS who support Roe v. Wade. He told Dem women in IA "he would break the tradition that judicial candidates shouldn't be disqualified" over a single issue. Asked at the Hotel Fort Des Moines "if he would appoint judges who would uphold" Roe v. Wade, Kerry said: "Yes. That is not a litmus test, so to speak." In an interview after he said: "I don't want to get into an argument about litmus tests. The focus is on the constitutional right that Roe established in America. I want jurists to agree, who swear to uphold the Constitution." More Kerry: "If some people want to call it a test, they can call it a test." Univ. of WI prof Donald Downs, on Kerry's jud nominee comments: "I can't think of any example where it's been put that baldly." More Downs: "You know that that's sort of behind the agenda of some people, but to come out and say so specifically that's pretty much unprecedented." RNC spokesperson Jim Dyke said Kerry "sounds like he's willing to say anything to get elected." NARAL IA dir. Brenda Kole, who asked the question of Kerry, said: "I was expecting a confident answer from him." But ex-Univ. of WI prof Charles Johnson said Kerry's statements on "regime change" and jud nominees "are either boldly calculated to appeal to liberal voters or careless and potentially damaging" (Beaumont, Des Moines Register, 4/9). More Kerry, after his speech: "Litmus tests are politically motivated tests; this is a constitutional right." He "contrasted" Roe support "because it is a constitutional right" with GOP demands that jud nominees oppose abortion rights and said: "They're trying to undo a constitutional right. That's the difference." In his remarks 4/8, Kerry also "echoed a warning" ex-VP Al Gore made about the president's ability to shape SCOTUS



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Dartmouth
The Free Press

Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs
Ampersand

Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals
Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media
ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search
Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.