4/26/2003 12:25:00 AM | Richie Jay More Responses Alston Ramsay () @ 04/25/2003 21:22: "Particular agenda"? Once again, did you actually read the editorial and article? Let's recap. I used two examples to illustrate my point, the first was prefaced with "for example" and referred to the diversity training on which the Review reported. After, I wrote, "Or what about...," clearly meaning that I was pointing to one more example. I could have pointed to numerous other examples of spending under the Dean of the College area that had not sufferef cuts this year. I didn't say it was a zero sum game and I didn't advocate the elimination of the program, but I did point out the way the College has no qualms about throwing money into social programs when academic ones suffer. (continued due to length). , Alston Ramsay () @ 04/25/2003 21:22: But had I said it was a zero-sum game--which I didn't--I still say you're incorrect to think the UGA program should receive funding (as much as it currently does) over the library. It's about priorities. Also, while the UGA program may employ part-time 100 or so students, the library employs about 170 adults, for whom this is their livlihood. Still, my point is that funding could be trimmed from the UGA program, as it could from many other areas, without significant impact, unlike the libraries, where every dime counts. In your rush to find something to criticize, you've completely ignored my point, and, in the process, shown a callous disregard for the College's academic mission. Since this debate started on the main page, let's finish it there. Please post this one., Brad Plumer (http://freedartmouth.com) @ 04/25/2003 21:48: Agree with Mr. Ramsay. We could probably bat around a number of good arguments for the UGA system (for instance, I think "cushy" student jobs are very beneficial to the college, much more than "actual" community jobs), but that wasn't the point of the editorial (or his article, which was very nicely done). The library is and should be one of the cornerstones of the college, and we should not be scraping off 1/15th of its operating budget until nearly every other college program around has undergone close scrutiny first. And he's absolutely right, the cuts are ridiculous and damaging. Sanborn is currently a wreck, with books flung carelessly all about the place. And I have yet to find anyone in the math department happy about the impending elimination of Cook. Pitiful. perma link |
| 0 comments
0 Comments: |
Dartmouth The Free Press Alums for Social Change The Green Magazine The Dartmouth Dartmouth Observer Dartmouth Review Dartlog Inner Office The Little Green Blog Welton Chang's Blog Vox in Sox MN Publius (Matthew Martin) Netblitz Dartmouth Official News Other Blogs Ampersand Atrios Arts & Letters Altercation Body and Soul Blog For America Brad DeLong Brad Plumer CalPundit Campus Nonsense Clarksphere Crooked Timber Cursor Daily Kos Dean Nation Dan Drezner The Front Line Instapundit Interesting Times Is That Legal? Talking Points Memo Lady-Likely Lawrence Lessig Lean Left Left2Right Legal Theory Matthew Yglesias Ms. Musings MWO Nathan Newman New Republic's &c. Not Geniuses Ornicus Oxblog Pandagon Political State Report Political Theory Daily Review Queer Day Roger Ailes SCOTUS blog Talk Left TAPPED Tacitus This Modern World Tough Democrat Untelevised Volokh Conspiracy Washington Note X. & Overboard Magazines, Newspapers and Journals Boston Globe Ideas Boston Review Chronicle of Higher Education Common Dreams Dissent In These Times Mother Jones New York Review of Books New York Times Salon Slate The American Prospect The Nation The New Republic The Progressive Tikkun Tom Paine Village Voice Washington Monthly Capitol Hill Media ABC's The Note American Journalism Review Columbia Journalism Review CQ Daily Howler Donkey Rising The Hill Medianews National Journal NJ Hotline NJ Wake-up call NJ Early Bird NJ Weekly Political Wire Roll Call Spinsanity Search Search the DFP |