A forum for independent, progressive, and liberal thinkers and activists from Dartmouth College.

Civilian casualties update
Dartmouth

The Free Press
Dartmouth Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs

Ampersand
Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals

Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media

ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com

Feedback by blogBack
 
 
  contact the freedartmouth

Wednesday, June 01, 2005


Gay Marriage in Native America
Here. (via NRO)


Posted by Timothy, 12:30 AM -

Tuesday, May 31, 2005


The First Time I Felt Sorry for Wolf Blitzer
I was watched CNN 20 minutes ago or so, and Wolf's guest was Ted Turner. Wolf said he was on to advertise that tomorrow would be the 25th anniversary of CNN, but that first Wolf wanted to ask about the importance of the news that it had been confirmed that Deep Throat was Mark Felt, the #2 person at the F.B.I. under Nixon. Turner said that he did not think it was that important. It was a long time ago, a historical footnote, and that he was much more concerned about present days like nuclear war and peace. Ei. However, most of the cable news channels do not seem to be giving this much coverage: just a few minutes on the front of the hour. I've already heard twice that Mark Felt's motivation might have been that he felt jealous that he didn't get the top FBI job after Hoover died. Watch for that spin, to see if the attempt begins to make Mark Felt seem unpatriotic.

Update: The nightly news programs all lead, I believe, with Deep Throat. I watched NBC mostly (I can't stand that new anchor and the new format on CBS). I think both NBC and ABC mentioned as a motivation that Felt didn't get promoted. When Anderson Cooper 360 began on CNN, I didn't stay to watch "G.Gordon Liddy and others" talk about Deep Throat. Pat Buchanan was so much more interesting on Hardball, calling Felt a snake and saying it was a real act of disloyalty. He led off with saying what Felt's motivation was (see above, the meme floats). Buchanan then snuck in a reference in about how Felt was convicted of something. Buchanan did this under the guise of saying Felt was wrongly convicted of course- Buchanan said he defended him at the time. It was clear (to me) that Buchanan was trying to make Felt out to be a bad guy. Matthews asked what the charge was- it had something to do watching Vietnam protesters without a warrant- Buchanan said Felt was later pardoned by Reagan. At the end, Chris Matthews said of course you think Deep Throat was a bad guy, you guys lost! The Nixon defenders went after Felt by saying that basically that he was responsible for the Holocaust in South Vietnam. Matthews laughed at this and said you guys did Cambodia, and said the burgulers were responsible: blame the perpetrators, not the guys who uncovered it. Buchanan said that the people who brought down Nixon were worse than Nixon (!). Matthews said that was a theory, and said they had to go to a break.

Fox News had some historian/journalist who said that Deep Throat and the Washington Post didn't make a difference: it was prosecutions and investigations. Ben Veniste (former Watergate prosecuter and Clinton defender) said that without two things (the Post stories and the Nixon tapes), Nixon would have served out his full term.

Update 2: Drudge has had a headline up reading "Woodward: Felt himself had hopes he would be next FBI director..." Buchanan was back on MSNBC for Olberman. He immediately brought up the promotion motive, and quickly mentioned Felt's conviction. Before Buchanan, John Dean was on. It was an interesting interview. Basically Dean said that Felt did not quite fit. Dean thought this suggested Deep Throat was a composite, even though Woodward had denied it. He thought Woodward now had a lot to answer for. Olbermann said this all pointed to the idea that Deep Throat was a composite, with Mark Felt as the centerpiece.


Posted by Timothy, 6:13 PM -

Monday, May 30, 2005


Rumsfeld's Way or The Highway

This article in the Baltimore Sun recounts 3-star general Riggs's demotion and forced retirement by the pentagon, apparently just for arguing that the army needs more troops, in contradiction with "The Rumsfeld Way". Demotions of this sort are supposedly only reserved for particularly awful scandals rather than the minor infractions of which Riggs is accused. Today, Krugman cites this incident as an example of why other generals are afraid to disagree with the Bush administration, and are kept in line by a climate of fear.


Posted by Justin Sarma, 1:52 PM -

Sunday, May 29, 2005


Nathan Newman on Abortion
Because we don't here enough about it.


Posted by Timothy, 11:54 AM -

E.J. Dionne on Right-wing postmodernists
From the Washington Post:
Conservative academics have long attacked "postmodernist" philosophies for questioning whether "truth" exists at all and claiming that what we take as "truths" are merely "narratives" woven around some ideological predisposition. Today's conservative activists have become the new postmodernists. They shift attention away from the truth or falsity of specific facts and allegations -- and move the discussion to the motives of the journalists and media organizations putting them forward. Just a modest number of failures can be used to discredit an entire enterprise.
...
this particular anti-press campaign is not about Journalism 101. It is about Power 101. It is a sophisticated effort to demolish the idea of a press independent of political parties by way of discouraging scrutiny of conservative politicians in power. By using bad documents, Dan Rather helped Bush, not John Kerry, because Rather gave Bush's skilled lieutenants the chance to use the CBS mistake to close off an entire line of inquiry about the president. In the case of Guantanamo, the administration, for a while, cast its actions as less important than Newsweek's.
After the 2000 election, The Nation has a cover with button like "Foucault 2000" and "Derrida for President". The cover was much better than the cover story (as is befitting, given the topic).

P.S. Notice that I have titled this post 'right-wing postmodernists'. That's Dionne's label, and I would have said 'conservative postmodernists' except I have used that label to describe some of things John Stevenson has said about race, and I think that my criticism of John is largely unrelated to this post.


Posted by Timothy, 11:10 AM -
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.