A forum for independent, progressive, and liberal thinkers and activists from Dartmouth College.

Civilian casualties update
Dartmouth

The Free Press
Dartmouth Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs

Ampersand
Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals

Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media

ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com

Feedback by blogBack
 
 
  contact the freedartmouth

Monday, January 24, 2005


In a flash of lucidity, Bush explains the social security crisis (which is "NOW"!)

Bush on social security, to the Wall Street Journal:

That’s part of—that’s part of the advice my new National Economic Council head
will be giving me as to whether or not we need to—here is the plan, or here is
an idea for a plan, or why don’t you just fix it. I suspect given my nature,
I’ll want to be—the White House will be very much involved with—I have an
obligation to lead on this issue—I think this will be an administrative-driven
idea—to take it on. And therefore, that that be the case, I have the
responsibility to provide the political cover necessary for members, I have the
responsibility to make the case if there is a problem, and I have the
responsibility to lay out potential solutions. Now, to the specificity of which,
we’ll find out—you’ll find out with time. -Bush to the WSJ, from the New Yorker (link)

I think Slater in Dazed and Confused could have explained it better. Worse, earlier he said that the social security crisis was "now" (link). But according to his own projections, SS won't be in deficit until 2042 (and the CBO projects a deficit to be even further off). I would think Republican would be up in arms at the idea of borrowing trillions of dollars to invest it in the stock market. Didn't the 2000 crash teach people anything?

The economist makes a good point about medicare being a much larger crisis than social security. The Prescription Drug Benefit worsened that crisis. Why is Bush trying to fix SS and not medicare then?



Posted by Justin Sarma, 10:56 PM -
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.