A forum for independent, progressive, and liberal thinkers and activists from Dartmouth College.

Civilian casualties update
Dartmouth

The Free Press
Dartmouth Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs

Ampersand
Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals

Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media

ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com

Feedback by blogBack
 
 
  contact the freedartmouth

Friday, September 24, 2004


Historical Myths
If this author, Ray Raphael, is right that Patrick Henry never gave his "Liberty or Death" speech, I am shocked.
More than we would like, our texts are based on warmed-over tales of the nineteenth century such as Patrick Henry’s “Liberty or Death” speech (written by William Wirt in 1817, forty-two years after the fact) and Paul Revere’s Ride (popularized in 1861 by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, who distorted every detail of the event to make his story better). Although many historians know better, these stories work so well that they must still be included, regardless of authenticity or merit. More of the myths are perpetuated in elementary and middle school texts than in AP high school texts, but this raises a troubling question: why are we telling children stories that we know to be false? Worse yet: why do we give these tales our stamp of approval and call them “history”?
(I am asking for more info, because I have never even heard this claim before... for the record, I remember that I had issues with the Loewen book, Lies My Teacher Told me, praised by the author linked to above.)


Posted by Timothy, 7:40 PM -

Thursday, September 23, 2004


Is it really healthy to have a Secretary of Defense who so easily confuses Bin Laden and Saddam?
In case you missed this, here is Rumsfeld confusing Saddam Hussein with Bin Laden in a speech before the National Press Club:
But if you think about it, that’s not the way the world really was before September 11th. Consider the world of September 10th and before. Two Americans and six others stood on trial by the Taliban in Afghanistan for the crime of preaching their religion. The leader of the opposition Northern Alliance, Massoud, lay dead, his murder ordered by Saddam Hussein – by Osama bin Laden, Taliban’s co- conspirator.
He corrected himself immediately, so no big deal, right? Later on in the same speech, Rumsfeld again confused the two men, this time without noticing it:
Saddam Hussein (sic), if he’s alive, is spending a whale of a lot of time trying to not get caught. And we’ve not seen him on a video since 2001. Now he’s got to be busy. Why is he busy? It’s because of the pressure that’s being put on him.
(via Rick Eyre)


Posted by Timothy, 1:49 AM -

To Laugh or Cry?
August Pollock of Xoverboard.com writes:
Redacted: Irony discovered to be alive and well

Okay, folks. You're going to love this one.

Newsweek is now reporting that CBS and 60 Minutes, in order to make room for their now-infamous report on alleged documents from George Bush's National Guard Service, dropped their originally planned piece for that evening's show... about the Bush administration being misled on erroneous documents pertaining to the alleged Iraqi purchases of uranium from Niger.


Posted by Timothy, 1:36 AM -

"Abu Ghraib: The Hidden Story"
Check this article in the New York Review of Books. Or you can read about the really important matters, like how Rathergate is Watergate.


Posted by Timothy, 1:33 AM -

Faith-Based Foreign Policy
Q Right here, Mr. President, thank you. Why do you think the CIA's assessment of conditions in Iraq are so much at odds with the optimism that you and Prime Minister Allawi are expressing at the moment?

PRESIDENT BUSH: The CIA laid out a -- several scenarios that said, life could be lousy, like could be okay, life could be better. And they were just guessing as to what the conditions might be like. The Iraqi citizens are defying the pessimistic predictions. The Iraqi citizens are headed toward free elections. This government has been in place for a little over two months, and the Iraqi citizens are seeing a determined effort by responsible citizens to lead to a more hopeful tomorrow. And I am optimistic we'll succeed. (link via Mark Kleiman, who comments on this wishful thinking.)


Posted by Timothy, 1:28 AM -

Norquist: The Greatest Generation is Anti-American
"Two million people who fought in World War II and lived through the Great Depression die every year. That generation has been an exception in US history, because it has defended anti-American policies. They voted for the creation of the welfare state and for obligatory military service. They are the Democratic base, and they are dying." GOP Super-Activist Grover Norquist. I can't believe there are such powerful conservatives that spew this bile. (via Sullivan)


Posted by Timothy, 1:20 AM -

Medical workers, terrorists, Same Difference to Right-wing media chains (NYT link)

A neocon friend just sent me this as an example of everything that's wrong with Reuters... except I mistaked it for an example of everything that's right with Reuters. As a policy, Reuters avoids "emotive" words? Sounds like a whitewash on the surface, but then again, maybe it's better to let the actions describe, rather than letting labels describe. "A terrorist attack bombed a night club", "A militant bombed a nightclub". Is there a significant different between these two statements that Neo-Cons have reason to get so huffy about? I'd argue that blanket labelling all such actions "terrorist" distracts the reader from the degradations of evil among the actions. For instance, the word "terrorist" pulls a reader away from the significant difference between an attack on a nightclub or schoolbus, and an attack on a settlement or military checkpoint.

I know that if I were a Reuters journalist in Iraq, I'd be upset if I found out some office bozo in Canada was find & replacing all of my reference to "militants" with references to "terrorists", and still attributing the work to me.

Here's the most egregious example:
The policy has caused Mr. Anderson's paper to issue two
corrections recently as the result of changes it made to articles provided by
The Associated Press. On Thursday, The Citizen changed an A.P. dispatch to
describe 6 of 10 Palestinians killed in the West Bank by Israeli troops as
"terrorists," a description attributed to "Palestinian medical officials." The
Associated Press had called those people "fugitives."
The Citizen published a
correction on Friday declaring it to be it an editing error and describing the
six dead as "militants." A week earlier, the newspaper inserted the word
terrorist seven times into an A.P. article about the fighting between Iraqis and
United States forces in the city of Falluja. Mr. Anderson called the two
episodes "silly errors."


Posted by Justin Sarma, 1:16 AM -
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.