A forum for independent, progressive, and liberal thinkers and activists from Dartmouth College.

Civilian casualties update
Dartmouth

The Free Press
Dartmouth Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs

Ampersand
Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals

Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media

ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com

Feedback by blogBack
 
 
  contact the freedartmouth

Friday, February 27, 2004


Must Reads
The Economist in favor of Gay Marriage, and not just Civil Unions either.
Oxblog's running tab on senate opinion on Bush's FMA.
Slate's review of Mel's movie.
Or, if you're in a big hurry, as most of this blog's readers probably are, you could just check Andrew Sullivan out. He's got the goods on The Passion and Gay Marriage.

I haven't seen the movie yet, and probably won't get to for a while. Did anyone actually enjoy it? I haven't read a good review of it yet. I've read that it is deeply moving, pornagraphic, sadistic, and that it gave one person a heart attack.
How's the acting?


Posted by Graham, 12:09 AM -

Thursday, February 26, 2004


John Kerry's outsourcing Bill

Anyone hear about John Kerry's recent senate bill designed to curb tech support outsourcing to India? I'm a Kerry supporter, but personally I don't like the sound of it.

The bill would require all foreign call centers to disclose their location at the beginning of the conversation. The irony is that I found the way Kerry's websites defends the bill to be more troubling than the criticisms of the bill. If you're going to pass a bill to protect jobs, just say so. Don't hide your intention inside accusations that people in poor countries are dishonest, like the following:


"Lastly, consumers are deeply concerned with the growing phenomenon of identity theft. Efforts to stem this tide and keep up with the technological advancements that enable these crimes have done little to allay those concerns. This trend becomes all the more frightening when millions of calls involving personal financial transactions are routed across our borders where laws and law enforcement are even more remote to U.S. customers."


Sure, consumers may be concerned about identity theft, but is there any evidence that putting call centers in India and other developing countries leads to identity theft? Kerry's website certainly doesn't supply any. I've heard of a lot of call scam, but none directly linked to legitimate foreign call centers. If anyone has this evidence please share. If not, then I can't help concluding that the allegation is simply racist.


Posted by Justin Sarma, 11:01 PM -

Wednesday, February 25, 2004


The Passion
Jami Bernard of the New York Daily News on the Passion:
"Mel Gibson's 'The Passion of the Christ' is the most virulently anti-Semitic movie made since the German propaganda films of World War II.
(...)
Jews are vilified, in ways both little and big, pretty much nonstop for two hours, seven minutes.
Gibson cuts from the hook nose of one bad Jewish character to the hook nose of another in the ensuing scene.
He misappropriates an important line from the Jewish celebration of Pesach ("Why is this night different from all other nights?") and slaps it onto a Christian context.
Most unforgivable is that Pontius Pilate (Hristo Naumov Shopov), the Roman governor of Palestine who decreed that Jesus be crucified, is portrayed as a sensitive, kind-hearted soul who is sickened by the tortures the Jewish mobs heap upon his prisoner.
Pilate agrees to the Crucifixion only against his better judgment.
The most offensive line of the script, which was co-written by Gibson with Benedict Fitzgerald, about Jews accepting blame, was not cut from the movie, as initially reported. Only its subtitle was removed.”



Posted by Timothy, 12:58 PM -

Tuesday, February 24, 2004


Fight The Good Fight

There's a mass movement a-brewin' to draft Mary Cheney, daughter of VP Dick Cheney, into the war against the same-sex-marriage-ban amendment. And I do believe it will be quite a war, of sorts.

Check out the site, read about how Dick Cheney has flip-flopped on this very personal issue, marvel at the Miracle-On-34th-Street-esque stampede of postcards folks have sent to Ms. Cheney (who will hopefully, someday, become Mrs. Cheney), and even send a postcard yourself! Again, it can only help.


Posted by Nick, 7:13 PM -

Cambodia's King is more liberal than Bush?
Cambodia's King Norodom Sihanouk has shown that advancing years are no barrier to an open mind and liberal attitude. After watching television images of gay marriages in San Francisco, the 81-year-old monarch has decided that single sex weddings should be allowed in Cambodia too. (BBC, via political aims)
And, Andrew Sullivan feels betrayed by Bush's announced support of the Federal Marriage Amendment.



Posted by Timothy, 3:39 PM -

Columbia Grad Student Bubble
Boy, when you're a grad student preparing a lecture on Adam Smith, you sure can miss a lot. This afternoon, I picked up a copy of the Columbia Daily Spectator on my way out of Philosophy Hall and saw this article on a silent protest by Columbia students over a Cartoon printed in The Fed. (See their apology here. I cannot find the cartoon on the web, but the Columbia Daily Spectator reprinted it today curiously with a small caption.) I then walked onto Columbia's 'green' and saw that students were again protesting, and many were walking around with signs saying "I am being SILENCED". The protesters also passed out fliars that talked about:
1) a December Columbia Marching event, which according to the fliar, there was "an overtly prejudiced attack in which they vilified people of color, women, and members of religious groups as well as demonstrated explicit homophobic remarks and antics in advertising what they consider to be a 'traditional' Columbia student event." One of the replicated pictures has a picture with Edward Said "X" ed out, and the caption "Mess with the Jews, will you?" and "Yaweh: 1, Said: 0." [sic] Another one had pictures and drawings of Michael Jackson.
2) a February Conservative Club Affirmative Action bake sale "during which no practical or factual discourse surrounding Affirmative Action legislation was facilitated. The event focused solely on debasing and trivializing the qualifications of entire ethnic and cultural groups."
[The only relevent Spectator article I could quickly find was an article on a Young Democrats counter-protest]
3) The fliar said of the Fed cartoon about Black History Month: "A 'flippant ad abrasive disclaimer' set the tone for a comic strip which reduced the history of Black Americans to being 'invented in the 1700s as a cheap form of labor."
Further panels of the cartoonhad Blacks playing basketball, discovering Funk, rapping, and the last panel ended with 'black people do even more crap crap, but don't worry about it until next February... and 'til then remember-- KILL WHITEY!'

Here's an article on Columbia President Bollinger's reaction, and the Spectator's editorial, which I haven't read.

I report, you decide: I must return to xeroxing readings by Lenin, Hobson and Schumpeter.


Posted by Timothy, 2:43 PM -

Monday, February 23, 2004


Feminism as a Flesh-Colored Bustier

Issue 4.10 of the DFP is now on the web. And as with the 10th web issue of each year, this one has once again been stricken by what our staff has termed “The Curse of Jared.” To get it, you’ll have to click here

Despite the Curse, the insides are just as juicy: Karsten keenly observes the dominance of white- and blue-skinned students at the Polar Bear Swim, Meredith Esser sheds light on the holiest of holies in an interview about the Vagina Monolgues, Sarah Ayres takes a bite out of the watered-down arguments of Sally Winn, Welton continues his crusade, and Andrew gives us more reasons not to care about the SAT. 'Twas a voluptuous issue all around, with much more to see inside.


Posted by Nick, 8:09 PM -

Sunday, February 22, 2004


Spoiler for President

Ralph Nader officially announced his candidacy today on Meet The Press. Ralph told Tim Rustert:

"There's too much power and wealth in too few hands," he said. "They have taken over Washington." "Washington is now corporate occupied territory," Nader said. "There is now a for-sale sign on most agencies and departments. ... Money is flowing in like never before. It means that corporations are saying no to the necessities of the American people. ... Basically, it's question of both parties flunking."

Both parties???? Washington is controlled by ONE party Nader! What reality are you living in? I really just find this stunning. Nader is putting his own ego above the principles he claims to support. If Nader really cares about strengthening third parties -- why doesn't he join a third party? He's not even a member of the Green Party. This is a sad day for progressives. I don't know who is supporting Nader or telling him to run, but I hope you think very carefully about what you're risking: four more years of Bush and the strong liklihood of a more conservative justice replacing O'Connor on the Supreme Court.

Ralph, please run for Senate in a blue state if you think you need to be involved in politics. Don't destroy a second Presidential election.


Posted by Dan, 10:46 AM -

"Didn't we already give them a break at the top?...What are we doing on compassion?" -Bush on tax cuts, to his inner cabinet.

Paul Krugman has a reviewof "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill", by Ron Suskind, in the New York Times Review of Books. The Suskind book received most of its coverage because in it O'Neill, the former White House Treasurer, claimed the Bush administration was planning to go to war with Iraq before September 11'th. But there are also some less publicized nuggets of white house conversation contained in its pages, like the following little exchange that allegedly took place between Bush and his inner cabinet:

They also knew that their policies heavily favored rich people—indeed, in an uncharacteristic moment Bush himself seemed uneasy over the tilt, asking, "Didn't we already give them a break at the top?" And when Bush asked, "What are we doing on compassion?," no one answered. -Krugman

"What are we doing on compassion?" How great is that? Even as a liberal, I find his naivete strangely endearing. Unfortunately, these personal doubts didn't stop him from insisting in public that "the vast majority of my tax cut goes to the bottom of the economic spectrum", as Krugman points out. Dick Cheney must have really had to slap him back into shape for that one.


Posted by Justin Sarma, 1:48 AM -
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.