1) The Greens don't want Nader to run, or so reports Micah Sifry for The Nation. And not because they don't want to have a candidate, necessarily, just because they don't want Ralph Nader to be their guy. Accusations are flying that he cut out the party leadership last time around, doesn't have the ability to build a real movement, and can't connect with people of color. Tough times.
2) Senator Ted Kennedy has won the George Bush Award for 2003. This is actually true. All I'm saying is that if my Dad decided to give a guy an award who had just spent the last three years giving me grief about most of my goals and professional aspirations, I'd be bummed out.
Posted by Graham,
4:56 PM
-
GDP surge and job creation: Good or bad? What's the verdict? From JobWatch:
Payroll jobs increased by 126,000 in October. While far preferable to further job losses, those job gains fall short of the 150,000 jobs a month necessary to prevent the slack in the labor market from worsening. Jobs remain 2.4 million below the level of March 2001 when the last recession began. This post-recession labor slump has now become the first (since the collection of monthly jobs data began in 1939) without a full recovery of jobs within 31 months of the start of a recession.
But there's another doctor's opinion. Reduced marginal tax rates will sustain the new economic-incentive structure for years to come. Lower taxes will keep on spurring new wealth and higher employment levels far longer than almost anyone dreams possible.
Good! But the tie-breaker quote goes to those staunch anti-capitalists over at The Economist:
Long after Dubya is back on his ranch, Americans will be trying to recover from the mess he created.
Not so good. Actually, all three of those articles are worth reading, especially the Economist piece, which harps yet again on the growing deficit problem. Personally, I hope Kudlow's right and the economy blasts off, even if it puts a dent in Howard Dean's big day. But the evidence doesn't look great right now.
Posted by Brad Plumer,
4:12 PM
-
I'm not listening! Politics can be difficult. Really difficult. All those questions. All those inquiries. Best to just plug your ears and sing "la la la la":
The Bush White House, irritated by pesky questions from congressional Democrats about how the administration is using taxpayer money, has developed an efficient solution: It will not entertain any more questions from opposition lawmakers.
Quite predictably, the usual Stalinists, traitors, and progressive stooges are siding with the Dems:
Norman Ornstein, a congressional specialist at the American Enterprise Institute, agreed [with the Democrats' outrage]. "I have not heard of anything like that happening before," he said. "This is obviously an excuse to avoid providing information about some of the things the Democrats are asking for."
Of course, in the WH's defense, the Democrats were asking questions like "how much the White House spent making and installing the "Mission Accomplished" banner for President Bush's May 1 speech aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln." Those big meanies. Big big big meanies. This should teach them.
Posted by Brad Plumer,
3:34 PM
-
While I realize that expecting maturity from The Dartmouth's editorial decisions is only ever going to end in dissapointment, I find their choice to publish this editorial particularly puerile.
Posted by Nikhil,
8:02 AM
-
Thursday, November 06, 2003 New National Primary Poll From Zogby. You might be interested by what they found out about regional and age breakdowns.
Posted by Graham,
2:56 PM
-
This brightens my day...
The new Rolling Stone's a-comin', and I for one am psyched!
No, no, no, you silly freedartmouth bloggers, this isn't another Jessica Simpson post. Look to the right... Al Sharpton!
Also, if you're one to believe the rumor mill, Al's gonna host SNL on Dec. 6. Party at my place.
Posted by Kate,
9:53 AM
-
Assisted Suicide and Terri Schiavo
A question that seems to go unasked in this business is whether or not it is inhumane to starve Mrs. Schiavo to death, despite her "persistent vegitative state." In other words, while people are contesting whether or not Mr. Schiavo has a right to remove his wife's feeding tube, ostensibly in accordance with her wishes, and offering contest on the basis that Mrs. Schiavo has a right to live (and that the government must protect that right), no one points to the fact that even if Mr. Schiavo has a right to stop feeding his wife in order that her wish to die in such a case be fulfilled, she will die inhumanely - by starving to death. It could take weeks.
Which raises another question. Assuming it Mrs. Schiavo left a written will stating that if she were ever in such a state, she would decline to be kept alive artificially, would it be moral to kill her rather than merely leaving her to die, if leaving her to die would cause her more suffering?
Posted by Jonathan,
1:53 AM
-
America's Most Honest Politician?
"When people get in my face, I tend to get in theirs," Dr. Dean said in the interview at The Times. "Al Sharpton was in my face last night and I was not going to step one step, half a step, backwards, and I don't care who's in my face.
"I tend to be reflective rather later than sooner," he added. "Now, unfortunately, we all know that nobody's personality is perfect. So the things that make me a strong candidate are also my Achille's heel."
This has got to be one of the most accurate portrayels of Dean's personality paradox that I have read yet. And it is comming from Dean himself.
When has an active politican been so candid about their flaws? I'm not saying its earth-shattering, but its worth considering.
Posted by Jordan,
12:43 AM
-
Wednesday, November 05, 2003 Dean and Confederate flag A story here. I did not see the beginning of the debate last night (busy grading papers for Columbia freshmen), so does anyone have thoughts?
"We tried to come up with a mascot that wasn't racist, biased or sexist, yet entirely unacceptable," Duquette said. "The intent was never to derail the mascot search."
The FBI has admitted to bugging Philadelphia mayor John Street's office. And from the way the BBC reports it, this sounds like old news. Did anybody hear this story break?
Talk about an election picking the lesser of two evils.
Posted by Nic,
3:57 PM
-
Dream Team Inspired by a recent discussion about the ideal veep: who's in the cabinet? Three choices seem obvious to me. Former UN ambassador, ambassador to Germany, and special envoy to Bosnia Richard Holbrooke should have been Clinton's Secretary of State and he has to be considered a (if not the) front-runner by now. Experience, intelligence, and firm patriotic loyalties...the man is one of the world's preeminent diplomats of the last 50. Current NY state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer would return the Justice Department to a noble institution which fights for the rights of all Americans and certainly would be a brilliant anti-cronyism choice. Sen. Bob Graham would be a prime Director of Homeland Security. This is an untapped office and would be shaped by his guidance.
Posted by Brian,
10:01 AM
-
I don't really watch much TV, but I was going to watch the Reagan mini-series on CBS. No longer my choice as CBS has disowned it and passed off to premium cable as a response to conservative pressure. Guess I'll just wait until it hits Direct Connect. This is a first in self-censorship by a major TV network, I might add. Reagan hasn't had much recent popularity on campus.
Posted by Brian,
9:44 AM
-
Monday, November 03, 2003 The Score A while back I criticized the TRN Primary website. Well, I just perused their grade chart for the month of October. They've now made it numerically official, their scores are absurd: Lieberman came out on top last month. Joe was buoyed by clutch grades in "General Likeability," "Intellectual Honesty" and "Political Courage."
If I hadn't just declared the whole thing I throw away, I'd be psyched that Howard Dean had the best average on Foreign on Domestic Policy, but alas.
And this all comes from someone who greatly enjoys reading the magazine. Very predictable, disappointing site.
Posted by Graham,
10:44 PM
-
Ann Coulter Action Figure If no one has yet linked to this...
The final version of the $87 billion spending bill for Iraq and Afghanistan is missing provisions the Senate had passed to penalize war profiteers who defraud American taxpayers. House negotiators on the package refused to accept the Senate provisions.
The Senate provision was authored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.). It was one of the last major sticking points this week as negotiators worked through the compromise appropriations bill. The conferees narrowly defeated the amendment after lengthy debate, with House negotiators offering no substitute and no willingness to compromise, despite repeated offers from Senate conferees to negotiate the language.
'No' on loan recall, 'yes' on profiteering? Enough of this crap. The Republican Congress is an utter disgrace. They want piracy? Hang 'em. Hang 'em all, from the highest yardarm in the fleet.
Posted by Brad Plumer,
8:56 PM
-
Sunset in the Sunshine State
Bob Graham has announced his retirement from the Senate. This is going to be a tough and important battle for the Dems. While he lagged in the Presidential primary, Graham was a largely popular figure in Florida and we are going to need an extremely strong candidate to replace him on the ballot. My pick:
Ivan Rodriguez
Posted by Jordan,
2:44 PM
-
A walk on the wild side: According to the New York Daily News, Howard Dean's campaign manifesto is coming out soon, describing Dean's "youthful drunken behavior and his occasional adventures in petty theft." Graciously, The Daily News offers up a sample of Dean's crazy antics:
Dean also reminisces about his fraught relationship with alcohol...
"Once we were 18, we could indulge in lazy days of 'Baseball and Ballantine,'" Dean writes. "We'd buy some beer and put it in a garbage can of ice and play softball all day long. If you hit somebody's beer with a batted ball, it was an automatic out."
Update: a couple of readers (both in comments and over e-mails) have informed me that the drinking age in 1966 was 18. Fair enough. I was never worried about that. Originally I just wanted to point out that Dean's "wild behavior" seemed rather, well, lame. ("Drinking beers at 18? Big deal..." &c) But John Buckholz has informed me that 'Baseball and Ballantine' is in fact, wild 'n' crazy, and Dean can reclaim his boozehound crown. Thank you, and good day.
Posted by Brad Plumer,
12:48 PM
-
Speaking of occupations: Over at The Inner Office, Emmett links to a bunch of magazine covers circa 1946 that complain about how badly the German occupation is going. I suppose his point is that today's naysayers should shut up and learn to show a little patience. Time to defer to Atrios on this one, who offers up a little history lesson:
In 1946, the German occupation was a miserable failure. Germany and much of the rest of Europe were on the brink of total economic and political collapse. It was such a miserable failure that people were criticizing it in major publications. It was such a miserable failure that we changed our policies in response to these criticisms and to the reality we faced. In fact, it wasn't until June of 1947 that the Marshall Plan had its public debut, and until April of 1948 that congress enacted the relevant legislation.
So, message of the day - keep on criticizing policies which aren't working and the people who are responsible for them. Maybe they'll eventually try something that works. Glad you're on our side.
The covers were pretty though...
Posted by Brad Plumer,
12:35 PM
-
Return of the Draft? Salon is reporting that the Bush Adminstration is moving to restock dormant draft boards, a sign indicating thier possible reactivation. It's worth a read, even more so because it quotes Prof. Ned Lebow of the Government department.
"The government is in a bit of a box," Lebow says. "They can hold reservists on active duty longer, and risk antagonizing that whole section of America that has family members who join the Reserves. They can try to pay soldiers more, but it's not clear that works -- and besides, there's already an enormous budget deficit. They can try to bribe other countries to contribute more troops, which they're trying to do now, but not with much success. Or they can try Iraqization of the war -- though we saw what happened to Vietnamization, and Afghanization of the war in Afghanistan isn't working, so Iraqization doesn't seem likely to work either."
"So," Lebow concludes, "that leaves the draft."...
"If Congress and Bush reinstitute the draft, it would be the '60s all over again," predicts Lebow. "It's hard to imagine Congress passing such a bill, but then, look how many members of Congress just rolled over and played dead on the bill for $87 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan."
Posted by Clint,
12:29 PM
-
That darn quagmire... Two words for Wesley Clark's interview with NewsHour: not impressed. Here's Clark's proposal for dealing with the Iraq occupation:
I put the international authority in. I reduce the influence of the U.S. occupying authority. I put the Iraqi governing council more in charge. I work for the constitution of the Iraqis in the long term. I keep the U.S. in charge of the security situation. I build up the Iraqi security forces. And I would... I do it all the same way we did it, let's say, in the Balkans. We put out a matrix. You said here's your political. Here's your economic. Here's your military. Here's what you're going to do this month, that month, so forth. Here's where you want to be. Here's your objectives. Here's how much it's going to cost. Show it to the American people.
Okay, so I'd be inclined to believe that Clark could probably oversee the operation more competently than Bush. But his "solution" doesn't really solve anything. There's no assurance that turning over the occupation to the UN would encourage foreign countries to pony up more aid and soldiers. Heck, there's no assurance that we even could turn authority over to the UN. Moreover, we've seen nothing to indicate that the Iraqi governing council is ready to take over. If anything, we'd be gearing up for Hamid Karzai part two. And the violence isn't going to end so long as foreign soldiers are in Iraq-- does Clark really think that adding a few German/French troops here and there will stop the terrorist attacks? What is the reasoning behind that?
The ugly part is that Clark and Bush are probably the only two presidential candidates who can seriously and credibly handle this situation... and neither of them have a half-decent strategy. It's time to realize that no one knows how to handle this situation. The Dem candidates continue to delude themselves into thinking that their UN trump card will magically fix everything. Only Donald Rumsfeld seems to have any appreciation for the real difficulties inherent in the occupation, and as Kevin Drum points out, the Pentagon may very well be working on a "Cut and Run" style strategy at this point. Which is just as foolish as anything Dennis Kucinich has proposed.
Posted by Brad Plumer,
12:26 PM
-
Sunday, November 02, 2003 So that's what the cameras were for A year later, James Nichols, brother of Oklahoma City Bombing conspirator Terry, a is suing Michael Moore for emotional distress and for duping him into being in his movie, Bowling for Columbine.
Posted by Graham,
7:38 PM
-
Trouble in Egypt Converts to Christianity are being rounded up. Saudi Arabia, Iran and Sudan all punish converting away from Islam with death, according to the linked article. At least the defense team for the arrested Christians is multi-faith.
Lest we ever forget how vital it is to maintain a firm separation of Church and State.
Posted by Graham,
7:17 PM
-
The coming anarchy: Ted Ralls on why the upcoming GOP Convention in Manhattan could turn into a disaster.:
Everyone from radical anarchists to moderate environmentalists expects the NYC/GOP ideological collision to spark the biggest American protest march since the end of the Vietnam War. Families of 9/11 victims, predominantly Democratic like the oasis of ideological sanity they live in, are so incensed at reports that the convention was timed to allow Bush to lay the Freedom Tower cornerstone at the World Trade Center site that many plan to join the protest. "Keep your hands off Ground Zero," Rita Lasar, head of a 9/11 victims group, warns Republicans. "Do not make a political football out of this."...
Activists are talking, some with barely hidden glee, about the possibility of violence. "It'll be Chicago 1968," a well-connected progressive leader predicts, referring to the "Days of Rage" riots during that year's Democratic National Convention. "Things are gonna burn, people are gonna die."
Sigh. All sides involved are uncivilized idiots. In an ideal world the Republicans would have the good taste and common sense to move the convention elsewhere. But they don't, they won't, and everyone's going to get what they deserve.
Posted by Brad Plumer,
2:59 PM
-
Link o' the day: Joseph Stiglitz on why Iraqi debt relief is necessary. He goes on to argue that we need to set up some sort of international framework for debt relief and debt restructuring. Too many countries pay for the sins of old dictators-- Argentina, Chile, Ethiopia-- and the policy only weakens the global economy. I'm not familiar with Stiglitz' other writing (Globalization and its Discontents, etc.) but he seems pretty sharp, and makes a good case.
Though I have to admit, I had a good chuckle over that subversively-titled link on the right side of Lady Likely ("Female-Free Dartmouth"). Very clever, ladies.