A forum for independent, progressive, and liberal thinkers and activists from Dartmouth College.

Civilian casualties update
Dartmouth

The Free Press
Dartmouth Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs

Ampersand
Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals

Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media

ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com

Feedback by blogBack
 
 
  contact the freedartmouth

Saturday, June 21, 2003


RE: Conservative Science
Thought this quote from Tom DeLay deserved posting:
In interviews with The Washington Post in 2001, Texas Republican Tom DeLay dismissed evolution as unproven, said that we shouldn't need an EPA because "God charges us to be good stewards of the Earth," and denigrated scientific Nobel Prize winners as "liberal and extremist."


Posted by Nikhil, 10:07 PM -

Conservative science

The Washington Monthly's Nicholas Thompson notes that Republicans are becoming increasingly hostile towards science and scientific research. Of course, you can't say the same thing about all conservatives. John Derbyshire dabbles in physics and concludes that the apocalypse is, in fact, right around the corner.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 8:00 PM -

Accountability

Even Glenn Reynolds thinks the Bush administration should stop dodging questions about 9/11. The Dems need to figure out how to make this an issue-- not a partisan issue, but a nationwide issue.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 5:00 PM -

Lackluster charter schools

The Washington Post has an interesting two-part article (one and two) about DC charter schools. These schools run themselves according to independent charters written by parents, community groups, educators, etc. On the whole, according to analysts, the schools do no better than the rest of the public school system. Reading the article, it's not hard to figure out why:

Many of the charter schools fill narrow educational niches. Marriott Hospitality, for example, is a high school providing training for the hotel and restaurant industry. The Elsie Whitlow Stokes elementary school has immersion programs in French and Spanish. And the Integrated Design & Electronics Academy gives teenagers a mix of vocational, military and college prep classes.

The menu of specialized offerings appeals to many parents, who say that the regular school system, in addition to its long-standing management problems, is not flexible enough to develop their child's particular interests or learning style.

"I don't think my son would do well in a traditional school with lots of rote work and lots of drill," said Julie Doar, explaining why she enrolled her 8-year-old son at the Children's Studio School, an elementary school where the lessons transcend traditional subjects, the classes are multi-age and the instructors are professional artists, some with no previous elementary teaching experience.
Blah blah my son's special and creative blah blah. Can anyone name any school that runs its classes like military drill sessions, as Ms. Doar claims? This is a bullshit excuse used to shield children from any amount of stress. Yet researchers have proven again and again that the only way to turn out intelligent kids is to force them to do hard work. And yes, that might mean your little genius has to stoop to memorizing multiplication tables. But he will assuredly be much better off learning long division than this hippie nonsense:

On a typical morning at Children's Studio this spring, a painter and a choreographer were guiding a dozen students in a sun-drenchedclassroom through lessons in geometry, dance and 17th-century architecture. One group of youngsters was weaving a loose lattice of string. Another was measuring floor tile. At each stage, the two teachers were making connections between mathematical symmetry, the Palace of Versailles and the invention of ballet. Outside the classroom, the hallways were crammed with mobiles, paintings, sculptures and chimes.
I will wager the farm that this classroom turns out idiots and dullards who are no more creative than your average public school student. Unfortunately, while the Post notes that charter kids are not doing any better on standardized tests, they fail to single out which schools are the worst offenders. They fail to make any connection between string-weaving and low test scores. Instead, they cite the usual sniveling excuse that:

There are no charters in the most affluent neighborhoods of the city, where most of the top-scoring traditional schools are located. Parents in those neighborhoods are likely to send their children to private school or to raise money to pay for additional teachers and programs at their neighborhood public school.
Utter crap. Money and social inequities are a factor, yes, but that doesn't have to stop schools from doing well. Look at Barclay Elementary School in Baltimore. A poor, black school shot to top levels in educational achievement after principal Gertrude Williams installed a rigorous curriculum and brought a stern sense of order and discipline to the classrooms, hallways and adminstrative offices. These things work, and they work far better than flowery dance lessons and hazy "whole language" approaches to reading and math (which have proved to be a colossal failure).

Although I agree in theory with school choice, I'm reconsidering after this article. Charter schools give ignorant parents and educators too much freedom in determining the shape of a school. Too many parents and educators think that "creative", naturalistic approaches to education are best for their kids. Too many parents and educators think they can happily blame social inequality when kids at these schools don't do well on standardized tests (which are neither racist nor biased nor a poor indicator of achievement). But they don't know what's best for kids, and if they really need proof, they can ask Japan, Taiwan, France, England, Germany, etc. etc. Until parents and educators realize this, they'll continue to create lackluster charter schools. Media outfits like the Post need to do a better job of asking why these schools aren't working, and what can be done to improve them.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 4:39 PM -

Here she comes

Update your bookmarks, Ann Coulter's starting a blog. This means daily insights of the following caliber:

Apart from Reagan’s inner circle, no one alive between World War II and the Reagan presidency could have imagined such a magnificent conclusion to the Cold War accomplished with such speed. Reagan was the first authentic conservative in the White House in over fifty years. That’s all it took.

We should, of course, be duly grateful to other American presidents for their feeble and impotent public statements in opposition to Soviet expansionism -- except Jimmy Carter, who was not remotely opposed to Soviet expansionism.

Still, the Soviet Union could have stumbled along for a few more decades, waiting out the Reagan administration and hoping for a Democrat president to come in and help the Soviets restore their hegemony. But Reagan wasn’t going to let the USSR outlast him.
Glad she cleared that up. I, for one, can't wait.

(Excerpts from her new book Treason can be found here.)


Posted by Brad Plumer, 1:21 PM -

Thursday, June 19, 2003


IHT: E.U. Weighs a more activist foreign policy
The European Union intends to create cohesive foreign policy to avoid situations where certain members attempt to get goodies from GWB and others attempt to usurp his throne. This and more from the International Herald Tribune (why don't we see more of that paper here?), here.

There's also a slightly more analytical article on this from the Christian Science Monitor, here and an article by Mushahid Hussain (former Pakistani minister and current senator who was imprisoned by Musharraf for a little over a year) in the Gulf Times with a Arab take on US/EU foreign policy tension here


Posted by Nikhil, 7:58 PM -

Democrats and WMD

Both Howard Dean and John Kerry are now publicly claiming that Bush lied about WMD and misled America.

Gutsy, but perhaps not the smartest of tactics. Alex Knapp has a better suggestion for the Democrats:

This is my free advice to Democratic Presidential candidates: don't claim that Bush is lying. Instead, fault the Administration's war plans that failed to secure any suspected WMD sites or known nuclear facilities, which led to their looting and destruction. [note: here's the relevant link]

Instead of calling for inqurities into whether Bush lied, which will go nowhere, why not call for inquiries into why the Administration's war plans didn't secure Iraq's WMD sites? Instead of yelling and screaming that Bush was lying, why not point out that the Administrations negligence made it possible for terrorists to have gotten their hands on Iraq's WMD supplies?
Agreed. Playing the "Bush lied" card is far too risky right now, especially for a presidential candidate. Those weapons could still very well turn up*, putting Kerry and Dean in a sticky situation. And these shrill accusations will sound much too much like partisan sniping, alienating swing voters and giving Bush the upper hand. I still think the Dems should attack Bush's foreign policy from the right, faulting him for being weak on security issues. Bringing up the nuclear looting is a good start.

Of course, the Dems shouldn't drop the issue entirely. But Dean and Kerry should steer clear, or stay cautious. Keep attack dogs like Graham on the case, and maybe--maybe-- in a few months, something will turn up that scuttles the administration. Wait for an investigation, wait for Tenet to resign, wait for anything more substantial than what they have right now.

* And there's still good reason to believe that weapons could turn up. According to Josh Marshall, all those high-ranking Iraqi officials we've nabbed still aren't talking. So the search isn't over yet.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 4:55 PM -

Oprah's back!

Oprah's book club is starting up again, with Steinbeck's East of Eden. I say splendid. If she gets millions of people reading, thinking, and watching fewer hours of Survivor, who am I to argue?

Dissenting opinions welcome, of course. Here's a thoughtful post written way back when we all thought the poor beast was gone for good.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 2:58 PM -

Wartime economies...

I don't know about you, but I find my combination of stark economic ignorance and compulsive need to link to complex economics articles, well, irresistable. So here's another one, a critique of the idea that 'war prosperity' lifted the US out of the Great Depression. It's interesting, I guess. Maybe even relevant.

(via The Corner)


Posted by Brad Plumer, 2:33 PM -

Rightwing pulpit up and running again...

The ever-spunky Andrew Sullivan believes that this TCS article is about the "moral abdication of the Western Left" on the Iran issue. Funny, I don't see it. The article explicitly asks for the media (which is merely a co-conspirator of the Western Left) and the Bush administration (which is probably not the Western Left) to pay more attention to Iran. What does this have to do with the moral abdication of the Left? Since when did Sullivan start sermonizing? Oh, right...

At any rate, for those Sullivanites inclined to call liberals hypocrites for not blogging/marching on the Iran issue, here's Kevin Drum and, more to the point, Atrios, who asks why Sullivan isn't blogging about female genital mutilation:

Email andrew sullivan at andrew@andrewsullivan.com and ask him why he doesn´t care about female genital mutilation. Does he enjoy it when females have their genitals mutilated?
I mean, honestly.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 2:20 PM -

The Hatch Virus
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) told an industry giving testimony in a hearing on electronic copyright protection that he was "interested" in developing technology that would destroy the computers of people who illegally download music.

Perhaps he's worried about losing the royalties on jewels like these?

(Note: this post blatantly ripped from XQUZYPHYR & Overboard.)


Posted by Clint, 1:39 PM -

Wednesday, June 18, 2003


Around the Muslim World people are waking up to these pictures:




And those are just the reuters shots.


Posted by Nikhil, 9:48 PM -

Patriot Act II

Everyone's been waiting for ages, reading the facts, poring over the leaked documents, and getting outraged. So just when, exactly, is Ashcroft going to try to push the damn thing by us? According to Chisun Lee of the Village Voice (link), it's already here. Ashcroft has been introducing portions of the legislation into Congress, piece by piece. And no one's been told that this is Patriot Act II. None of the alarms are going off. Well, umm... yikes!

Ashcroft urged Congress to boost anti-terrorism powers in three major ways: make more acts punishable as terrorism under a broadened definition of providing "material support" to suspect groups, allow longer pre-trial detention for people accused of a terrorism-related offense, and make it easier to sentence people accused of "terrorist acts" to death. Asked last Friday whether these would make it into a final White House request, and what other ideas would be added in the end, Justice Department spokesperson Mark Corallo would not specify, saying only, "There will be a package of legislation sooner rather than later."

Although Ashcroft's pitch for new powers made headlines, unreported were parts of his testimony that might help Americans decide whether he should get them. For one, there was his understated slant on death sentences. The possibility of execution would be most valuable as a way to "encourage cooperation" in suspects, he said, not dwelling on the more concrete result of such a sentence.
And so it starts. You can get the leaked full text of Patriot Act II here. And Beverly Lumpkin has a nice overview, for all you impatient folk (link).

Update: Even if we gave Ashcroft all the toys and tools he needed, it doesn't seem like he could catch anything anyways. Alexander Gourevitch has the goods on Ashcroft's "successes" since 9/11. Seems like somebody at the Justice Department keeps inflating the statistics on just how many terrorists they've nabbed...


Posted by Brad Plumer, 7:39 PM -

How Bush I lost the election

Interesting pair of posts by Rich Kleinman over at YankeeBlog on how Bush the Elder was defeated in 1992 (links: one and two).

The comparisons aren't perfect, but relevant nonetheless. Like Kleinman says, H.W. lost, in part, after being saddled with a weak economy, breaking with his conservative agenda (No New Taxes, for starters), and seemingly spending too much time on foreign policy. Of course, Bush II probably won't get skewered from the right like his father did. Pat Buchanan's primary run in '92 did a fair bit to weaken Pa Bush's perceived primacy, and Ross Perot certainly siphoned off the right-wing economic purists. It's doubtful that W. will face either sort of challenge. About the worst that can happen is that his "gay-friendly" agenda alienates Jerry Falwell and the hard Christian right. (link. There were a few stories in the National Review a few months ago about this, but I can't find them...) And I don't think that's enough to decide an election.

Anyways, it's a nice little history recap for those of us who, like me, weren't really into politics back then. (I was no doubt playing with my Ninja Turtles at the time...)


Posted by Brad Plumer, 7:15 PM -

Those toothless Democrats...

This Washington Post article nails it: the Democratic presidential contenders have failed utterly to muster up a coherent economic challenge to Bush.

Under Bush, the U.S. economy has lost about 3 million private-sector jobs. The unemployment rate has risen from 4.2 percent to 6.1 percent. The Dow Jones industrial average, despite a recent rebound, remains more than 1,100 points below the levels of January 2001. The president's tax cuts and spending increases have turned budget surpluses into record deficits that some experts say amount to a long-term fiscal crisis.

In the face of those figures, Democrats appear stymied. The party's congressional wing, operating in the minority, has neither the votes nor the megaphone to carry an economic message, party strategists acknowledge. The party's presidential candidates speak with nine voices, and they have failed to make the economy a consistent and coherent focus of their messages. Polls show that the public neither blames Bush principally for the state of the economy nor recognizes a Democratic alternative.
Looks like mere Bush-bashing isn't going to cut it...


Posted by Brad Plumer, 6:45 PM -

Tuesday, June 17, 2003


Deficits

Apparently the US trade deficit is what should be keeping us all awake at night. Go read this long and informative post by Billmon, and start fretting.

Oh, and bonus points to anyone smart enough to critique or confirm what he says. I sure as hell can't.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 3:28 PM -

A libertarian perspective on gun, internet control


Eugene Volokh has a great piece in the National Review about gun control. He links this UPenn study correlating gun ownership and household deaths. The study has been picked up by the New York Times, among others, as proof that gun ownership is fatal. Volokh, with his usual incisiveness, dissents:

The study, however, completely failed to control for what might well be the most important factors: whether the household contained violent criminals, gang members, drug dealers, and the like. These are the very factors that might cause both gun ownership and gun death. And because the study didn't control for them, it says nothing about whether gun ownership really "increases the odds" that a law-abiding citizen will be killed. The study's results could easily flow simply from the huge set of homicide victims who are themselves criminals.
And this is how bad social science leads to bad policy. Volokh adds a bit more in this blog post.

Also worth reading is this cute post knocking down Bill O'Reilly's latest carping about the dangers of an unregulated internet.


Posted by Brad Plumer, 3:10 PM -

Monday, June 16, 2003


What the world thinks of America
Unsurprising results from a BBC poll:
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to an international poll for the BBC say they have an unfavourable opinion of George W Bush... The sample of over 11,000 respondents also showed negative attitudes about American initiatives, such as the war on terrorism and US efforts in the Middle-East.
The survey does have a few more interesting findings. Firstly, American's do seem to know, in general, that they're "unloved" as such but put it down to misunderstanding:
However 70% of the American respondents said other countries did not appreciate how much America does to avoid civilian casualties.
Second, there is a clear distinction in most peoples' minds between Americans and the American government:
Attitudes towards America as a whole, however, were a lot more favourable, with 50% expressing fairly or very favourable views, as opposed to 40% of unfavourable views.
Incidentally, many of the favorable views were expressed in Israel, Australia and the UK; Gulf States and Indonesia seemed to balance these outliers.

I heard this on BBC World Service Radio, but here is a link to the BBC Online Summary that I quoted from.


Posted by Nikhil, 9:14 PM -

Take a look at this picture

...and then click here for the full map.
....or here for the source and more maps like it.
Courtesy of the Bureau d'Etudes, a group of French artists.

EDIT: The mother of all postmodern french cartographic artists, The Tangential University. Ha.


Posted by Nikhil, 8:07 AM -

Sunday, June 15, 2003


But can you buy soy milk by the quart?
This correction at Slate made me smile:
Correction: In Monday's "Ballot Box," referring to presidential candidate Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, I wrote, "Somebody toss a dollar in his guitar case so he can buy a quart of milk." Kucinich, a vegan, does not drink milk.


Posted by Timothy, 4:14 PM -

About those trailers...
WMD factories? Not so much. Try hydrogen factories for artillery ballons.

On a related note, Judith Miller needs to be fired.


Posted by Clint, 1:25 PM -
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.