Free Dartmouth
11/03/2005 01:47:00 AM | Nathan Empsall

Wouldn't It Be Cool?

No one with two young children wants to spend time in prison - Daddy, why are those men putting handcuffs on you? Can we play? Mommy, why can't Daddy come to my fifth birthday party? Sixth? Seventh? Eighth?

So Libby turns on Rove, rats him out to save his own skin. Rove also has young children - and believe it or not, is, by all accounts, a good father. Now you've got both of them on trial. Obviously, for all this to happen, some time has to pass, so we'll say it's now November 2006, and the Democrats suddenly control the House of Representatives.

Rove and Libby, as well as the three other indicted junior aides, all turn on the upper echelons of the administration during their trial - we WERE misled about the Iraq War, and these two to five clowns were just cooperating with the coverup. Cheney and Bush are both forced to resign - and President Pelosi takes over.

Clearly, this isn't going to happen. Libby might fink on Rove, but it's doubtful. The two almost certainly won't fink on the friends and mentors they've worked for for years, and even if they did, Bush and Cheney almost certainly didn't know the specifics of the leak. Sure, they may have had an inkling about, a wink and a nod, but that's what fall guys are for - plausible deniability. There probably isn't enough to impeach even in a Democratically controlled Senate, much less a Republican one. Why would the men resign if there was no threat of impeachment? Bad polls? They're not running for re-election. And of course, we're not going to retake the House in 2006. The nation will want us to, but the way Congressional districts are carved up right now make it far too hard to throw out incumbents. We'll make significant gains, but Dennis Hastert will remain Speaker, and he'd be an even worse President than Bush or Cheney.

But, you've got to admit, it sure would be cool. It might tear the nation apart, and would create public mistrust in government even worse than Watergate did. That's not a good thing. But still, a President Pelosi instead of a President Bush? The Bushies and their minions forever damaged goods? I don't like Pelosi much, but it sure is a nice dream. Dare to dream.

Links to this post:

Create a Link


Post a Comment

The Free Press

Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs

Arts & Letters
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
Campus Nonsense
Crooked Timber
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Talking Points Memo
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
Talk Left
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals
Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media
ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call

Search the DFP
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.