Free Dartmouth
 
  home  
  join
6/05/2004 06:08:00 PM | Timothy

Reagan's no longer with us
Two contrasting views: Lou Cannon's obituary in the Washington Post, and Daily Kos on the likely revisionist history coming.

Update: I wouldn't mention this, but CNN just went on a long riff about how Reagan gave a great speech on the anniversary of D-Day. Seems they forgot to mention how, despite loud protests, Reagan saw fit to visit Bitburg Cemetary, where S.S. troops were also buried (Ed Rollins writes that the excuse was that Reagan gave his word to Kohl because Kohl said the visit was very important). Anyway, someone will scream in response: how can you say this on Reagan's death? The man lived a long life. His death was not tragic or unexpected. Basically I do not like the American tradition where only nice words are said about someone who has died. English obituaries on my understanding, assess a person's life, and can be scathing. No one needs be as 'rude' as the English, and I think there isn't a point to meaningless attacks on the dead. But when other's praise of the dead on a specific event wrongly glosses over such controversy, I think it merits mentioning, at least here on a small blog.



6/04/2004 10:48:00 PM | Timothy

Bullshit from The New Criterion
A piece in The New Criterion says:
...we watched the press dither about how best to describe the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners. “Humiliation”—probably the most accurate term—made a brief appearance. But it was quickly retired because it didn’t make the perpetrators look bad enough. The lackluster “mistreatment” made a brief showing, as did “abuse,” especially in the phrase “sadistic abuse.” But after a few weeks the clear favorite was “torture.” After all, everyone knows Saddam tortured hundreds of thousands of people. So when a handful of low-lifes mistreat their charges, the media calls it torture, thus insinuating the desired moral equivalence between Saddam’s thugs and the U.S. army.
Let's leave aside the likely factual error I have put in bold above (I doubt they can prove the media had bent over backwards to use the harshest words possible. I have seen too many television shows refering to the 'prisoner abuse' scandal to believe that 'abuse' made only a 'brief showing'. ). How in the world can the TNC say that humiliation is "probably the most accurate term"? Christ. I'm sick of right-wing idiots who cry 'moral equilivence' only to show they have no sense of decency or show they cannot use their power of judgment.




6/04/2004 10:39:00 PM | Timothy

Nathan Newman on Al Jazeera
Don't withhold information you know happened. Al Jazeera passed that test. The US networks failed. It was Al Jazeera that showed the results of US bombing-- the dead and crippled-- and the deaths of Americans themselves once they invaded. And they showed US soldiers threatening families as they went door to door.

They also showed the other side, the US military side, where they were willing to broadcast statements by the US government as to why everything was happening. As one top US official admits in the documentary, Al Jazeera was willing to broadcase almost any statement they gave them.

Yet Al Jazeera was accused of being deceptive. Because it didn't censor images unflattering to the US. Images that the US media, as if they were state-controlled media, dutifully refused to run as part of the war effort. Who served truth?

Al Jazeera, whatever their bias, at least ran information from both sides of the argument. The roots of torture at Abu Ghraib can be seen in this documentary, as US reporters refused to ask tough questions and instead became stenographers for Donald Rumsfeld. (link)
Discuss.




6/04/2004 05:57:00 PM | Timothy

Michael Gazzaniga to step down as Dean of the Faculty
The Dartmouth's story is here.
Gazzaniga's decision comes in the wake of a contentious faculty vote last week against his leadership....
In his e-mail, Wright acknowledged the differences among faculty members that led to Gazzaniga's resignation and vowed to help heal them.
It would helpful to know what those differences were.

Update: Hmmm... I first heard of this through a blitz entitled "eDartmouth Special Report", received by me at 5:55. According thedartmouth.com, their story went up at 5:48 p.m. Dartlog had a post up on the story at 4:21. The letter from Wright is posted here. But I had only linked to story in The Dartmouth because it said it was special! (also, here's an old D article, via an old dartlog posting. Grossman's D.C. grudge theory is at the bottom of the comments).



6/02/2004 12:35:00 PM | Karsten Barde

It's Only Just Begun

Today Trustee Rodgers claims in another lengthy op/ed in The Dartmouth that this will be his last letter to the editor defending himself against charges of racism. I doubt it.

He is obviously a man who thrives on the feeling of being unpopular (like some other folks I know, who just published an enormous interview with him--not yet available online). That's fine by me. What he needs to understand, though, is that the majority of students, faculty, administrators and Trustees, if not alumni, support the College's efforts to:
a) provide a safe and supportive environment for all students here;
b) improve opportunities for members of underprivileged groups to attend Dartmouth; and
c) "to come together as a community and to begin to engage in a critical, respectful examination of our assumptions about race" (from President Wright's 2002 convocation address).

We are prepared to keep vigilance against his "color-blind" agenda, whether through correspondence to The D, to his place of employment, to his BlitzMail account, or otherwise. We agree with Professor Wilder that the "absence of color is not merit; [it is] segregation," and that's not what we want for our College. How Rodgers chooses to respond is up to him.



Dartmouth
The Free Press

Alums for Social Change
The Green Magazine
The Dartmouth
Dartmouth Observer
Dartmouth Review
Dartlog
Inner Office
The Little Green Blog
Welton Chang's Blog
Vox in Sox
MN Publius (Matthew Martin)
Netblitz
Dartmouth Official News

Other Blogs
Ampersand

Atrios
Arts & Letters
Altercation
Body and Soul
Blog For America
Brad DeLong
Brad Plumer
CalPundit
Campus Nonsense
Clarksphere
Crooked Timber
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dean Nation
Dan Drezner
The Front Line
Instapundit
Interesting Times
Is That Legal?
Talking Points Memo
Lady-Likely
Lawrence Lessig
Lean Left
Left2Right
Legal Theory
Matthew Yglesias
Ms. Musings
MWO
Nathan Newman
New Republic's &c.
Not Geniuses
Ornicus
Oxblog
Pandagon
Political State Report
Political Theory Daily Review
Queer Day
Roger Ailes
SCOTUS blog
Talk Left
TAPPED
Tacitus
This Modern World
Tough Democrat
Untelevised
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Note
X. & Overboard

Magazines, Newspapers and Journals
Boston Globe Ideas
Boston Review
Chronicle of Higher Education
Common Dreams
Dissent
In These Times
Mother Jones
New York Review of Books
New York Times
Salon
Slate
The American Prospect
The Nation
The New Republic
The Progressive
Tikkun
Tom Paine
Village Voice
Washington Monthly

Capitol Hill Media
ABC's The Note
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
CQ
Daily Howler
Donkey Rising
The Hill
Medianews
National Journal
NJ Hotline
NJ Wake-up call
NJ Early Bird
NJ Weekly
Political Wire
Roll Call
Spinsanity

Search
Search the DFP

www.blogwise.com
Powered by Blogger

The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Dartmouth College or the Dartmouth Free Press.